Talk:the show: 09-25-06
From zefrank
Is the running commentary necessary in a transcript? Unigolyn 00:27, 26 September 2006 (PDT)
[edit]
I don't think it's hurting
Considering the show we're talking about, with Ze pretending to be angry - for angry day - as a running commentary on the anger [real or not] of the dweeby dude with the YouTube ghost of a show... I would think the fake anger of the transcriber is simply an added funny layer of commentary, serving to point out the original joke in a subtle way. I think it adds something rather than takes away from the show.