User talk:Gelbi

From zefrank

I'm out for the night. You keep the hard charger at bay.:) --AaronStJ 20:36, 6 June 2006 (PDT)

Well, I'm going to sleep myself, haven't seen any hard charger yet...

Thanks for your Vote on the World Cup :) maybe in a few years we'll be able to start our own Propaganda. Today our Keyboards... Tommorow the World! --Yozef 5.27, June 8

Speaking of the devil... --Gelbi 18:38, 8 June 2006 (PDT)

Contents 1 anti-votes 2 Whatup? 3 in charge 4 How do You Work This Thing? 5 15 secs or less 6 25 secs or more 7 Are the new viewers gone yet? (link) 8 Knowledge (link) 9 Limericks and hikos (link) 10 Misc (link)

anti-votes

Why no anti-votes? It seems perfectly reasonable. If people have no opinion about the rest of the intros (for example) but they dislike the douchebag version - why not give them their say without forcing them to commit to some other junky intro? 68.6.101.96 18:20, 8 June 2006 (PDT)

I'm obviously just hard-charging and you don't have to follow my rules (that was probably the only comment I will leave on the issue.) Here's the reason, if you just leave the comment "this section sucks" it doesn't really help anyone... Do you think that by discouraging the peole who are actually trying to come up with content, it will somehow magically appear??? It's different when we vote to decide between different scripts and are more into trimming things down. Negative votes during content generation is just very bad psychology... The only acceptable way to say "you guys all suck" is in my opinion to write a better section. --Gelbi 18:37, 8 June 2006 (PDT)

Because anti-votes contribute nothing. If they don't like a section, so what? We need a section to use instead. We can't have no intro. So you have to pick one. --AaronStJ 18:24, 8 June 2006 (PDT)

Yes that was a much shorter way of saying it :) --Gelbi 18:37, 8 June 2006 (PDT)

Well, I suppose I can see the logic in that argument. But obviously some issues aren't a "choose one" type of thing. Like voting whether or not to keep a line, or change a line. Fresheneesz 23:08, 9 June 2006 (PDT)

Whatup?

Yo-yo, whatup in the house? CeruleanNinja 16:01, 17 June 2006 (PDT)

in charge

you look like the guy in charge this time around (kudos) I fixed the link on the 15 secs because it didn't show the full page and I change the pics on wtf to links cause it was too noisy

NO! I'm not in charge... I tried to find a compromise between separate pages and having them show on the main page, but its really a mess. If anyone does something, I will be very happy! :) So, I guess I'm very happy you did something! --Gelbi 08:44, 18 June 2006 (PDT)

ok welp I have a few suggestions, but not the best at wiki

How do You Work This Thing?

draft

Add your 15 seconds If you have something you want to post make sure it is in the correct area for better viewing.

Leave a comment or suggestion click the discussion area

Respectfully edit someone else's work

Do not delete lines, simply strike it through and write your own. (like this)

Please do not delete sections. Simply copy and paste unwanteds into the 'Magic Dumpster' (above)

Brainstorm: Discuss general script ideas at Brainstorming [link]

Check out old ideas from last week's brainstorming [link]

If your contribution is missing let someone know by clicking the edit and describe your work, everyone will search for it.

15 secs or less

25 secs or more

Are the new viewers gone yet? (link)

Knowledge (link)

Limericks and hikos (link)

Misc (link)

My thoughts are that it needs to look clean. I also think the (links) should have a duckie icon you click on, instead of the numbers if this is possible

There might be an easier way to set up voting for each section later on, I will look into this.

What do you think? Can you set any of this up, I'm willing to figure wiki out, but I'm a bit gun shy, don't want to screw it up? :)