ZEFRANK.COM - message board  

Go Back   ZEFRANK.COM - message board > DEBATE HALL
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 06-28-2006, 10:28 PM   #1
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Energy Part 2

In response to the article appearing in most major newspapers across the country concerning the $8.4 billion profit reported by Exxon. Concern over profits by this oil company has brought about accusations of gouging the American consumer. According to the article, "CEOs from Exxon and its industry peers have already appeared twice at Senate hearings and were asked to justify their profits shortly after reporting them to shareholders." This has to be an American first. I have never heard of a company being called to justify it's profits. One wonders if an extension of this idea could be made to other companies in other industries as well.

Per the article, "Lawmakers believe the profits are made on the backs of consumers who are paying a national average of $2.91 a gallon - 68 cents more than last year. Exxon says a strong commodities market combined with fortuitous planning and prudent management are producing record numbers." This should make Americans ask the fundamental question: what is the difference between what a public non-profit utility company provides and what a private for-profit oil company provides? Afterall, they both sell energy to all United States citizens. The difference is that natural gas and electricity are sold in the form of a public good whereas oil is sold in the form of a private good. Accordingly, on the grounds of promoting national security, the United States Congress should convert all oil companies to utility companies. This would eliminate the windfall profits and force the oil industry to earn just enough income to cover operating expenses just as natural gas and electric utility companies are required to do. The resulting drop in gasoline prices would further stimulate the economy and lighten the energy stranglehold upon the United States by the Middle East. It would also eliminate the influence of the oil lobby. In this case, desperate times call for deliberate measures.
JOEBIALEK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 03:26 AM   #2
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 68
I havenít firmed up my position on this, but here are a few thoughts.
Let the prices go were they will. A higher fuel price will force people to become more prudent/efficient in how they use fuel. Higher fuel prices allows other emerging technologies to better compete and some day could overtake the big oil companies. Ethanol is starting to make large strides in becoming competitive. It also provides great agricultural opportunities for farmers.

Iím generally not in favor of the government setting our prices.
It might feel good at first, but part of the problem with government controlling prices is that it stifles potential competition.

On the other hand we need to ensure that large oil companies are playing a fair game in the market place. They should not be able manipulate the energy market unfairly so as to ensure they are the only players.

I guess I would prefer more oversight v.s. Government price setting.
TruthSeeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 05:48 PM   #3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
good points

good points
JOEBIALEK is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.